How can data science improve customer service?

The 2001 Enron Scandal

In the mid-2000s, Enron Corporation arrived at sensational statures just to confront a bewildering fall. Money Street goliaths go wrong because false monetary information influenced a great many workers and shook Wall Street to its center. Lamentably, the information that was being given to investors was completely made up.

To such an extent that towards the end, evaluators started to shred archives to cover their tracks. Be that as it may, it was past the point of no return. Enron’s leaders and their reviewing firm conveyed anecdotal information to investors and the Board of Directors in yearly reports and budget summaries for quite a long time.

Autonomous moral reviewing of the information Enron set forward might have forestalled a monetary misrepresentation of this greatness from happening.

Lead in Gasoline during the 1920s.

During the 1920s, Tetraethyllead was regularly added to gas for the reason that it could handle thumping in motors. This lamentably added to more than 5,000 passings in the US alone from lead openness.

The leaded gas industry and the US government at the time directed and utilized information from uncertain tests to endorse this choice.

The lead paint and leaded gas businesses exchanged the fault for the unexpected ascent fatalities from lead harming for quite a long time, each guaranteeing their items were ok for individuals. If an autonomous examination of these businesses’ awful information and the public authority had depended upon it was led, maybe so many lives would not have been lost.

Share:

Written by Bourbiza Mohamed

A technology enthusiast and a passionate writer in the field of information technology, cyber security, and blockchain

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Can You Pay Your Employees in Cryptocurrency?

How the AI-to-Data Continuum is Forever Changing Work