The United States asked Britain’s High Court yesterday to overturn a judge’s decision that Julian Assange should not be sent to the US to face espionage charges, promising that the WikiLeaks founder would be able to serve any prison sentence he receives in his native Australia.
n January, a lower court judge refused an American request to extradite Assange on spying charges over Wiki-Leaks’ publication of secret military documents a decade ago. District Judge Vanessa Baraitser denied extradition on health grounds, saying Assange was likely to kill himself if held under harsh US prison conditions.
An attorney for the US government, James Lewis, argued that the judge erred when she ruled Assange would be at risk of suicide because of the oppressive conditions. He said American authorities had promised Assange would not be held before trial in a top-security ‘Supermax’ prison or subjected to strict isolation conditions, and if convicted would be allowed to serve his sentence in Australia. Mr Lewis said the assurances “are binding” on the US.
US authorities also argue that Assange does not meet the threshold of being so ill that he cannot resist harming himself. Mr Lewis said Assange did “not even come close to having an illness of this degree”.
“Once there is an assurance of appropriate medical care, once it is clear he will be repatriated to Australia to serve any sentence, then we can safely say the district judge would not have decided the relevant question in the way that she did,” Mr Lewis said.
Assange’s lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald, said in a written submission that Australia had not agreed to take Assange if he is convicted. Even if Australia did agree, Mr Fitzgerald said the US legal process could take a decade, “during which Mr Assange will remain detained in extreme isolation in a US prison”.
He accused US lawyers of seeking to “minimise the severity of Mr Assange’s mental disorder and suicide risk”.
Several dozen pro-Assange protesters rallied outside London’s Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing, which is scheduled to last two days.
Assange, who is being held at Belmarsh Prison, had been expected to attend by video link, but Mr Fitzgerald said he had been put on a high dose of medication and “doesn’t feel able to attend the proceedings”.
A video link later showed Assange appearing to listen to the hearing at times. His lawyers say he has experienced physical and mental health problems over the years.
The two judges hearing the appeal are not expected to give their ruling for several weeks. That will likely not end the legal saga, however, since the losing side can seek to appeal to the UK Supreme Court.
US prosecutors have indicted Assange on 17 espionage charges and one charge of computer misuse over Wiki-Leaks’ publication of thousands of leaked military and diplomatic documents. The charges carry a maximum sentence of 175 years in prison, although Mr Lewis said “the longest sentence ever imposed for this offense is 63 months.”
US prosecutors say Assange unlawfully helped US army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning steal classified cables and military files that WikiLeaks published. Lawyers for Assange argue he was acting as a journalist and is entitled to First Amendment freedom of speech protections for publishing documents that exposed US military wrongdoing in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In her January judgment, Judge Baraitser rejected defence arguments that Assange faces a politically motivated American prosecution that would override free-speech protections, and she said the US judicial system would give him a fair trial.
Assange (50) has been in prison since he was arrested in April 2019 for skipping bail during a separate legal battle.
Before that, he spent seven years inside Ecuador’s London embassy, where he fled in 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden to face allegations of rape and sexual assault. Sweden dropped the sex crimes investigations in November 2019 as so much time had elapsed, but Assange remains in prison.